[llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment. (PR #109307)

[Simone Campanoni via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/scampanoni created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109307

None

>From 3a2e0feaf2878993080ea2944d5d63de364a8950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simone Campanoni <campanoni at google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:14:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [SimplifyCFG] Better aligned a comment.

---
 llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index c63618d9dd1297..2046ac4cc3ef52 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static InstructionCost computeSpeculationCost(const User *I,
 }
 
 /// If we have a merge point of an "if condition" as accepted above,
-/// return true if the specified value dominates the block.  We
-/// don't handle the true generality of domination here, just a special case
-/// which works well enough for us.
+/// return true if the specified value dominates the block.  We don't handle
+/// the true generality of domination here, just a special case which works 
+/// well enough for us.
 ///
 /// If AggressiveInsts is non-null, and if V does not dominate BB, we check to
 /// see if V (which must be an instruction) and its recursive operands