[llvm] [Codegen][LegalizeIntegerTypes] Improve shift through stack (PR #96151)
Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 22 06:50:18 PDT 2024
================
@@ -238,18 +270,34 @@ define void @ashr_32bytes(ptr %src.ptr, ptr %byteOff.ptr, ptr %dst) nounwind {
; ALL-NEXT: ldp x9, x8, [x0, #16]
; ALL-NEXT: ldr x10, [x1]
; ALL-NEXT: ldr q0, [x0]
-; ALL-NEXT: and x10, x10, #0x1f
+; ALL-NEXT: and x11, x10, #0x18
; ALL-NEXT: stp x9, x8, [sp, #16]
; ALL-NEXT: asr x8, x8, #63
; ALL-NEXT: mov x9, sp
; ALL-NEXT: str q0, [sp]
+; ALL-NEXT: add x9, x9, x11
; ALL-NEXT: stp x8, x8, [sp, #48]
; ALL-NEXT: stp x8, x8, [sp, #32]
-; ALL-NEXT: add x8, x9, x10
-; ALL-NEXT: ldp x10, x9, [x8, #16]
-; ALL-NEXT: ldr q0, [x8]
-; ALL-NEXT: str q0, [x2]
-; ALL-NEXT: stp x10, x9, [x2, #16]
+; ALL-NEXT: lsl x8, x10, #3
----------------
arsenm wrote:
It still doesn't make sense to be to be considering unaligned accesses when there is no unaligned access in the source operation, and no need to introduce one. I don't think anything like this belongs in this patch, and it seems more like a missing optimization elsewhere
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96151
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list