[llvm] [AMDGPU][True16][MC] added VOPC realtrue/faketrue flag and fake16 instructions (PR #104739)

[Ivan Kosarev via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1623,7 +1687,25 @@ defm V_CMP_NGT_F16_t16    : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11_gfx12<0x00b, "v_cmp_ngt_f16">;
 defm V_CMP_NLE_F16_t16    : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11_gfx12<0x00c, "v_cmp_nle_f16">;
 defm V_CMP_NEQ_F16_t16    : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11_gfx12<0x00d, "v_cmp_neq_f16">;
 defm V_CMP_NLT_F16_t16    : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11_gfx12<0x00e, "v_cmp_nlt_f16">;
-defm V_CMP_T_F16_t16      : VOPC_Real_with_name_gfx11<0x00f, "V_CMP_TRU_F16_t16", "v_cmp_t_f16", "v_cmp_tru_f16">;
+defm V_CMP_T_F16_t16      : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11<0x00f, "v_cmp_t_f16", "V_CMP_TRU_F16_t16", "v_cmp_tru_f16">;
+
+defm V_CMP_F_F16_fake16      : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11<0x000, "v_cmp_f_f16">;
+defm V_CMP_LT_F16_fake16     : VOPC_Real_t16_gfx11_gfx12<0x001, "v_cmp_lt_f16">;
----------------
kosarev wrote:

Just curious: how hard it would be to make the `VOPC_Real_t16_*` multiclasses to define both the t16 and fake16 variants? Could also remove the need to duplicate the names of instructions in arguments?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104739