[llvm] AtomicExpand: Allow incrementally legalizing atomicrmw (PR #103371)

Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 13 23:48:56 PDT 2024


arsenm wrote:

> To be clear, I think this patch is doing the right thing. As the code notes, we can't stick an fadd inside an ll/sc loop,

If you want the fadd in the ll/sc loop, that's in #103702



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103371


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list