[llvm] [Analysis] Use range-based for loops (NFC) (PR #103540)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 4f5d866af7fed0de1671a68530d3023e9762b71e ac39a86f96250e0a388e74706b5f924ef4eae8ad --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index 8aa73d9256..75c4136a24 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -6665,8 +6665,8 @@ const ConstantRange &ScalarEvolution::getRangeRef(
     if (Add->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
       WrapType |= OBO::NoUnsignedWrap;
     for (const SCEV *Op : drop_begin(Add->operands()))
-      X = X.addWithNoWrap(getRangeRef(Op, SignHint, Depth + 1),
-                          WrapType, RangeType);
+      X = X.addWithNoWrap(getRangeRef(Op, SignHint, Depth + 1), WrapType,
+                          RangeType);
     return setRange(Add, SignHint,
                     ConservativeResult.intersectWith(X, RangeType));
   }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103540