[llvm] [DebugInfo] Add expression decoding for `DW_OP_implicit_pointer` (PR #102923)
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 12 09:09:44 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# Test that we can decode `DW_OP_implicit_pointer` (0xa0)
+# RUN: yaml2obj %s | llvm-dwarfdump - | FileCheck %s
+
+# CHECK: DW_TAG_variable
+# CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_location (DW_OP_implicit_pointer 0x2a +0)
+
+--- !ELF
+FileHeader:
+ Class: ELFCLASS64
+ Data: ELFDATA2LSB
+ Type: ET_DYN
+ Machine: EM_X86_64
+DWARF:
+ debug_abbrev:
+ - Table:
+ - Code: 0x00000001
+ Tag: DW_TAG_compile_unit
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_yes
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_language
+ Form: DW_FORM_data2
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_low_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_addr
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_high_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_data4
+ - Code: 0x00000002
+ Tag: DW_TAG_subprogram
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_yes
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_low_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_addr
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_high_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_data4
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_frame_base
+ Form: DW_FORM_exprloc
+ - Code: 0x00000003
+ Tag: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_no
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_location
+ Form: DW_FORM_exprloc
+ - Code: 0x00000004
+ Tag: DW_TAG_variable
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_no
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_location
+ Form: DW_FORM_exprloc
+ debug_info:
+ - Length: 52
+ Version: 5
+ UnitType: DW_UT_compile
+ AbbrOffset: 0
+ AddrSize: 8
+ Entries:
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000001
+ Values:
+ - Value: 0x000000000000000C
+ - Value: 0x0000000100000F50
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000034
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000002
+ Values:
+ - Value: 0x0000000100000F50
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000034
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000001
+ BlockData:
+ - 0x56
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000003
+ Values:
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000002
+ BlockData:
+ - 0x91
+ - 0x78
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000004
+ Values:
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000006
+ BlockData:
+ - 0xa0
+ - 0x2a
----------------
felipepiovezan wrote:
Could you add two comments here, one saying that 0xa0 is the encoding of `DW_OP_implicit_pointer ` and that `0x2a` is the DIE offset for the TAG_variable DIE entry "above" (the one with abbrev code 3)?
Just to make the test slightly easier to reason about
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102923
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list