[clang] [llvm] [Sanitizer] Make sanitizer passes idempotent (PR #99439)
Fangrui Song via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 26 13:45:21 PDT 2024
MaskRay wrote:
> all previous proposals to add such "re-run" protection ended up with "the pipeline is wrong". But implementation is so trivial, so I don't mind just to have it implemented.
While the implementation is trivial, I also share the concern whether sanitizers should do this. There are many other instrumentation passes. Do they all need something like this? I feel this change hasn't been well motivated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99439
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list