[clang] [llvm] [AArch64][PAC] Sign block addresses used in indirectbr. (PR #97647)

[Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -10685,6 +10689,26 @@ SDValue AArch64TargetLowering::LowerBR_JT(SDValue Op,
   return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRIND, DL, MVT::Other, JTInfo, SDValue(Dest, 0));
 }
 
+SDValue AArch64TargetLowering::LowerBRIND(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
+  MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachineFunction();
+  std::optional<uint16_t> BADisc =
+      Subtarget->getPtrAuthBlockAddressDiscriminator(MF.getFunction());
+  if (!BADisc)
+    return SDValue();
+
+  SDLoc DL(Op);
+  SDValue Chain = Op.getOperand(0);
+  SDValue Dest = Op.getOperand(1);
+
+  SDValue Disc = DAG.getTargetConstant(*BADisc, DL, MVT::i64);
+  SDValue Key = DAG.getTargetConstant(AArch64PACKey::IA, DL, MVT::i32);
+  SDValue AddrDisc = DAG.getRegister(AArch64::XZR, MVT::i64);
+
+  SDNode *BrA = DAG.getMachineNode(AArch64::BRA, DL, MVT::Other,
----------------
asl wrote:

yeah, having `BR_JT` nodes is certainly more correct way, but seems to be more invasive. Worth a `TODO` added, yes.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97647