[clang] [libcxx] [llvm] Reapply "[Clang] Implement resolution for CWG1835 (#92957)" (PR #98547)
Krystian Stasiowski via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 19 16:32:06 PDT 2024
sdkrystian wrote:
> Another option would be to apply the resolution to all modes, but recover and issue a warning instead of an error. How feasible would that be?
@mizvekov Without unannotated tentative parsing (to be _properly_ introduced by #96364), issuing a warning is infeasible. Either way, by the time we detect the error we could be who knows how deep into the second operand of a `>` operator.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list