[clang] [compiler-rt] [XRay] Add support for instrumentation of DSOs on x86_64 (PR #90959)

[Brian Cain via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+//===-- xray_init.cpp -------------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file is a part of XRay, a dynamic runtime instrumentation system.
+//
+// XRay initialisation logic for DSOs.
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic.h"
+#include "xray_defs.h"
+#include "xray_flags.h"
+#include "xray_interface_internal.h"
+
+using namespace __sanitizer;
+
+extern "C" {
+extern const XRaySledEntry __start_xray_instr_map[] __attribute__((weak))
+__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
+extern const XRaySledEntry __stop_xray_instr_map[] __attribute__((weak))
+__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
+extern const XRayFunctionSledIndex __start_xray_fn_idx[] __attribute__((weak))
+__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
+extern const XRayFunctionSledIndex __stop_xray_fn_idx[] __attribute__((weak))
+__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
----------------
androm3da wrote:

> With -fxray-enable, are you refering to the general -fxray-instrument flag or -fxray-enable-shared?

Yes, the general flag.

> If the main executable was built entirely without -fxray-instrument, linking the DSO will fail, as the __xray_register_dso and __xray_deregister_dso functions could not be resolved.

Ok, right - that makes sense.

> However, this would probably be best as a separate PR.

Agreed - if you decide it's appropriate, good for a follow-up.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959