[llvm] (Draft) [SCEV] forgetValue: support (extractvalue 0, (with-overflow-i… (PR #98015)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 8 04:46:45 PDT 2024
https://github.com/v01dXYZ created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98015
Starter for fixing #97586
>From 45e55186f48292ac7e9d82687ef49d724b679790 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: v01dxyz <v01dxyz at v01d.xyz>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:19:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] (Draft) [SCEV] forgetValue: support (extractvalue 0,
(with-overflow-inst op0, op1))
Without that, forgetValue stops at (with-overflow-inst op0, op1) while
thanks to MatchBinaryOp, SCEV creation considers %extractvalue as if
it is (op op0, op1).
Because of that, it creates an unclearable SCEV value that could
possibly turn out of sync after a transform is applied.
The commit is in Draft as the fix is not satisfactory (code
duplication, do we push EVO to Visited ?). Meant for discussion and
for adding a test.
---
llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | 29 ++++++++++++++-
.../Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index 430e1c6d8f8c69..8139c7d92548ac 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -8412,8 +8412,35 @@ void ScalarEvolution::visitAndClearUsers(
SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &ToForget) {
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
Instruction *I = Worklist.pop_back_val();
- if (!isSCEVable(I->getType()))
+ if (!isSCEVable(I->getType())) {
+ // detect if a user is matching the pattern
+ // extractvalue 0, (with-overflow-inst op1, op2))
+ auto *WO = dyn_cast<WithOverflowInst>(I);
+
+ if (!WO)
+ continue;
+
+ for (auto *WOUser : WO->users()) {
+ auto *EVO = dyn_cast<ExtractValueInst>(WOUser);
+
+ if (!EVO)
+ continue;
+
+ if (EVO->getNumIndices() != 1 || EVO->getIndices()[0] != 0)
+ continue;
+
+ ValueExprMapType::iterator It =
+ ValueExprMap.find_as(static_cast<Value *>(EVO));
+ if (It != ValueExprMap.end()) {
+ eraseValueFromMap(It->first);
+ ToForget.push_back(It->second);
+ }
+
+ PushDefUseChildren(EVO, Worklist, Visited);
+ }
+
continue;
+ }
ValueExprMapType::iterator It =
ValueExprMap.find_as(static_cast<Value *>(I));
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp
index a7b3c5c404ab75..a6a5ffda3cb706 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp
@@ -1589,4 +1589,40 @@ TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, ApplyLoopGuards) {
});
}
+TEST_F(ScalarEvolutionsTest, ForgetValueWithOverflowInst) {
+ LLVMContext C;
+ SMDiagnostic Err;
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseAssemblyString(
+ "declare { i32, i1 } @llvm.smul.with.overflow.i32(i32, i32) "
+ "define void @foo(i32 %i) { "
+ "entry: "
+ " br label %loop.body "
+ "loop.body: "
+ " %iv = phi i32 [ %iv.next, %loop.body ], [ 0, %entry ] "
+ " %iv.next = add nsw i32 %iv, 1 "
+ " %call = call {i32, i1} @llvm.smul.with.overflow.i32(i32 %iv, i32 -2) "
+ " %extractvalue = extractvalue {i32, i1} %call, 0 "
+ " %cmp = icmp eq i32 %iv.next, 16 "
+ " br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %loop.body "
+ "exit: "
+ " ret void "
+ "} ",
+ Err, C);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(M && "Could not parse module?");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(!verifyModule(*M) && "Must have been well formed!");
+
+ runWithSE(*M, "foo", [](Function &F, LoopInfo &LI, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
+ auto *ExtractValue = getInstructionByName(F, "extractvalue");
+ auto *IV = getInstructionByName(F, "iv");
+
+ auto *ExtractValueScev = SE.getSCEV(ExtractValue);
+ EXPECT_NE(ExtractValueScev, nullptr);
+
+ SE.forgetValue(IV);
+ auto *ExtractValueScevForgotten = SE.getExistingSCEV(ExtractValue);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ExtractValueScevForgotten, nullptr);
+ });
+}
+
} // end namespace llvm
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list