[clang] [llvm] [clang][OpenMP] Shorten directive classification in ParseOpenMP (PR #94691)
Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 25 09:09:32 PDT 2024
================
@@ -2374,88 +2374,206 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy Parser::ParseOpenMPDeclarativeDirectiveWithExtDecl(
case OMPD_unknown:
Diag(Tok, diag::err_omp_unknown_directive);
break;
- case OMPD_parallel:
- case OMPD_simd:
- case OMPD_tile:
- case OMPD_unroll:
- case OMPD_task:
- case OMPD_taskyield:
- case OMPD_barrier:
- case OMPD_taskwait:
- case OMPD_taskgroup:
- case OMPD_flush:
- case OMPD_depobj:
- case OMPD_scan:
- case OMPD_for:
- case OMPD_for_simd:
- case OMPD_sections:
- case OMPD_section:
- case OMPD_single:
- case OMPD_master:
- case OMPD_ordered:
- case OMPD_critical:
- case OMPD_parallel_for:
- case OMPD_parallel_for_simd:
- case OMPD_parallel_sections:
- case OMPD_parallel_master:
- case OMPD_parallel_masked:
- case OMPD_atomic:
- case OMPD_target:
- case OMPD_teams:
- case OMPD_cancellation_point:
- case OMPD_cancel:
- case OMPD_target_data:
- case OMPD_target_enter_data:
- case OMPD_target_exit_data:
- case OMPD_target_parallel:
- case OMPD_target_parallel_for:
- case OMPD_taskloop:
- case OMPD_taskloop_simd:
- case OMPD_master_taskloop:
- case OMPD_master_taskloop_simd:
- case OMPD_parallel_master_taskloop:
- case OMPD_parallel_master_taskloop_simd:
- case OMPD_masked_taskloop:
- case OMPD_masked_taskloop_simd:
- case OMPD_parallel_masked_taskloop:
- case OMPD_parallel_masked_taskloop_simd:
- case OMPD_distribute:
- case OMPD_target_update:
- case OMPD_distribute_parallel_for:
- case OMPD_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
- case OMPD_distribute_simd:
- case OMPD_target_parallel_for_simd:
- case OMPD_target_simd:
- case OMPD_scope:
- case OMPD_teams_distribute:
- case OMPD_teams_distribute_simd:
- case OMPD_teams_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
- case OMPD_teams_distribute_parallel_for:
- case OMPD_target_teams:
- case OMPD_target_teams_distribute:
- case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_parallel_for:
- case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
- case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_simd:
- case OMPD_dispatch:
- case OMPD_masked:
- case OMPD_metadirective:
- case OMPD_loop:
- case OMPD_teams_loop:
- case OMPD_target_teams_loop:
- case OMPD_parallel_loop:
- case OMPD_target_parallel_loop:
- Diag(Tok, diag::err_omp_unexpected_directive)
- << 1 << getOpenMPDirectiveName(DKind);
- break;
default:
- break;
+ switch (getDirectiveCategory(DKind)) {
+ case Category::Executable:
+ case Category::Meta:
+ case Category::Subsidiary:
+ case Category::Utility:
+ Diag(Tok, diag::err_omp_unexpected_directive)
+ << 1 << getOpenMPDirectiveName(DKind);
+ break;
+ case Category::Declarative:
+ case Category::Informational:
+ break;
+ }
}
while (Tok.isNot(tok::annot_pragma_openmp_end))
ConsumeAnyToken();
ConsumeAnyToken();
return nullptr;
}
+StmtResult Parser::ParseOpenMPExecutableDirective(
+ ParsedStmtContext StmtCtx, OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind, SourceLocation Loc,
+ bool ReadDirectiveWithinMetadirective) {
+ assert((DKind == OMPD_error ||
+ getDirectiveCategory(DKind) == Category::Executable ||
+ getDirectiveCategory(DKind) == Category::Subsidiary) &&
+ "Directive with an unexpected category");
+ bool HasAssociatedStatement = true;
+ Association Assoc = getDirectiveAssociation(DKind);
+
+ // OMPD_ordered has None as association, but it comes in two variants,
+ // the second of which is associated with a block.
+ // OMPD_scan and OMPD_section are both "separating", but section is treated
+ // as if it was associated with a statement, while scan is not.
+ if (DKind != OMPD_ordered && DKind != OMPD_section &&
+ (Assoc == Association::None || Assoc == Association::Separating)) {
+ if ((StmtCtx & ParsedStmtContext::AllowStandaloneOpenMPDirectives) ==
+ ParsedStmtContext()) {
+ Diag(Tok, diag::err_omp_immediate_directive)
+ << getOpenMPDirectiveName(DKind) << 0;
+ if (DKind == OMPD_error) {
+ SkipUntil(tok::annot_pragma_openmp_end);
+ return StmtError();
+ }
+ }
+ HasAssociatedStatement = false;
+ }
+
+ SourceLocation EndLoc;
+ SmallVector<OMPClause *, 5> Clauses;
+ std::bitset<llvm::omp::Clause_enumSize + 1> SeenClauses;
----------------
kparzysz wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94691
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list