[llvm] [GISel][RISCV]Implement indirect parameter passing (PR #95429)
Sergei Barannikov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 16 14:34:54 PDT 2024
================
@@ -790,6 +810,59 @@ bool CallLowering::handleAssignments(ValueHandler &Handler,
CCValAssign &VA = ArgLocs[j + Idx];
const ISD::ArgFlagsTy Flags = Args[i].Flags[Part];
+ // We found an indirect parameter passing, and we have an
+ // OutgoingValueHandler as our handler (so we are at the call site or the
+ // return value). In this case, start the construction of the following
+ // GMIR, that is responsible for the preparation of indirect parameter
+ // passing:
+ //
+ // %1(indirectly passed type) = The value to pass
+ // %3(pointer) = G_FRAME_INDEX %stack.0
+ // G_STORE %1, %3 :: (store (s128), align 8)
+ //
+ // After this GMIR, the remaining part of the loop body will decide how
+ // to get the value to the caller and we break out of the loop.
+ // NOTE: In the case, when the the pointer pointing to the value is passed
+ // in a register there is an exception to this, that is detailed bellow.
+ if (VA.getLocInfo() == CCValAssign::Indirect && Flags.isSplit() &&
+ !Handler.isIncomingArgumentHandler()) {
+ Align StackAlign = DL.getPrefTypeAlign(Args[i].Ty);
+ MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
+ int FrameIdx = MFI.CreateStackObject(OrigTy.getScalarSizeInBits(),
+ StackAlign, false);
+
+ Register PointerToStackReg =
+ MIRBuilder.buildFrameIndex(PointerTy, FrameIdx).getReg(0);
+
+ MachinePointerInfo DstMPO =
+ MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(MF, FrameIdx);
+
+ Align DstAlign =
+ std::max(DL.getStackAlignment(), inferAlignFromPtrInfo(MF, DstMPO));
+
+ MIRBuilder.buildStore(Args[i].OrigRegs[Part], PointerToStackReg, DstMPO,
+ DstAlign);
+
+ // If the value is not on the stack, then dispatch the process of
+ // moving it to the correct place for the call to the rest of the code.
+ if (!VA.isMemLoc()) {
+ ArgReg = PointerToStackReg;
+ }
+ // This value assign or load are needed here for the case, when the
+ // pointer to stack is passed, since there is no other case later that
+ // would handle this.
+ if (VA.isMemLoc()) {
+ LLT MemTy = Handler.getStackValueStoreType(DL, VA, Flags);
+ MachinePointerInfo MPO;
+ auto PassedStackAddress = Handler.getStackAddress(
+ MemTy.getSizeInBytes(), VA.getLocMemOffset(), MPO, Flags);
+ MIRBuilder.buildStore(PointerToStackReg, PassedStackAddress, DstMPO,
+ DstAlign);
----------------
s-barannikov wrote:
> So it thinks the stored type is an s32 instead of a pointer. A pointer is 32 bit on rv32, the architecture which I use for testing.
> Is it ok this way? Or it should be pointer type, not the actual type "under" the pointer?
We should try to preserve "pointerness" as long as we can.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95429
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list