[llvm] [BOLT][AArch64] Fixes assertion errors occurred when perf2bolt was executed (PR #83394)

[Ádám Kallai via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// Test how BOLT handles indirect branch sequence of instructions in
+// AArch64MCPlus builder.
+// This test checks that case when we have no shift amount after add instruction.
+// This pattern comes from libc, so needs  to build '-static' binary to
+// reproduce the issue easily.
+//
+//   adr     x6, 0x219fb0 <sigall_set+0x88>
+//   add     x6, x6, x14, lsl #2
+//   ldr     w7, [x6]
+//   add     x6, x6, w7, sxtw => no shift amount
+//   br      x6
+// It also tests another case when we use '-fuse-ld=lld' along with '-static'
+// which produces the following sequence of intsructions:
+//
+//  nop   => nop/adr instead of adrp/add
+//  adr     x13, 0x215a18 <_nl_value_type_LC_COLLATE+0x50>
+//  ldrh    w13, [x13, w12, uxtw #1]
+//  adr     x12, 0x247b30 <__gettextparse+0x5b0>
+//  add     x13, x12, w13, sxth #2
+//  br      x13
+
+
+// REQUIRES: system-linux
+// RUN: %clang %s -o %t.exe -Wl,-q -static -fuse-ld=lld --target=aarch64-linux
+// RUN: llvm-bolt %t.exe -o %t.bolt --print-cfg \
+// RUN:  --debug 2>&1 | FileCheck --match-full-lines %s
----------------
kaadam wrote:

Yes, probably it's better to use errs() indeed, we have less output. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83394