[llvm] [LV] Support binary and unary operations with EVL-vectorization (PR #93854)

[Florian Hahn via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/fhahn commented:



> > Just to double check, this isn't needed for correctness, right?
> 
> that's correct.

Great, could you add more detail about the motivation of the change to the PR description, i.e. why it is preferable to use the EVL version instead of regular wide ops?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93854