[llvm] [LICM] Fold associative binary ops to promote code hoisting (PR #81608)

[Ricardo Jesus via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -2778,6 +2780,75 @@ static bool hoistMulAddAssociation(Instruction &I, Loop &L,
   return true;
 }
 
+/// Reassociate general associative binary expressions of the form
+///
+/// 1. "(LV op C1) op C2" ==> "LV op (C1 op C2)"
+///
+/// where op is an associative binary op, LV is a loop variant, and C1 and C2
+/// are loop invariants.
+///
+/// TODO: This can be extended to more cases such as
+/// 2. "C1 op (C2 op LV)" ==> "(C1 op C2) op LV"
+/// 3. "(C1 op LV) op C2" ==> "LV op (C1 op C2)" if op is commutative
+/// 4. "C1 op (LV op C2)" ==> "(C1 op C2) op LV" if op is commutative
+static bool hoistBOAssociation(Instruction &I, Loop &L,
+                               ICFLoopSafetyInfo &SafetyInfo,
+                               MemorySSAUpdater &MSSAU, AssumptionCache *AC,
+                               DominatorTree *DT) {
+  if (!isa<BinaryOperator>(I))
+    return false;
+
+  Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(&I)->getOpcode();
+  BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I.getOperand(0));
+
+  auto ClearSubclassDataAfterReassociation = [](Instruction &I) {
+    FPMathOperator *FPMO = dyn_cast<FPMathOperator>(&I);
+    if (!FPMO) {
+      I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+      return;
+    }
+
+    FastMathFlags FMF = I.getFastMathFlags();
+    I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+    I.setFastMathFlags(FMF);
+  };
+
+  if (I.isAssociative()) {
+    // Transform: "(LV op C1) op C2" ==> "LV op (C1 op C2)"
+    if (Op0 && Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
+      Value *LV = Op0->getOperand(0);
+      Value *C1 = Op0->getOperand(1);
+      Value *C2 = I.getOperand(1);
+
+      if (L.isLoopInvariant(LV) || !L.isLoopInvariant(C1) ||
+          !L.isLoopInvariant(C2))
+        return false;
+
+      bool singleUseOp0 = Op0->hasOneUse();
+
+      // Conservatively clear all optional flags since they may not be
----------------
rj-jesus wrote:

We now do, check `test_single_use`. Though I expected one-use cases to be folded earlier and independently hoisted.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81608