[llvm] [llvm][SelectionDAG] Relax llvm.ptrmask's size check on arm64_32 (PR #94125)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff c5e417a812d86226b087346cadb05d3aae9fe1d0 1db465c3997b857c9df374acb22e2cebcaf6befb -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index 2851fe0035..94d81a9ea6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -7846,8 +7846,10 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall(const CallInst &I,
     // zero-extended to 64 bits when in registers.  Thus the mask is 32 bits to
     // match the index type, but the pointer is 64 bits, so the the mask must be
     // zero-extended up to 64 bits to match the pointer.
-    EVT PtrVT = TLI.getValueType(DAG.getDataLayout(), I.getOperand(0)->getType());
-    EVT MemVT = TLI.getMemValueType(DAG.getDataLayout(),  I.getOperand(0)->getType());
+    EVT PtrVT =
+        TLI.getValueType(DAG.getDataLayout(), I.getOperand(0)->getType());
+    EVT MemVT =
+        TLI.getMemValueType(DAG.getDataLayout(), I.getOperand(0)->getType());
     assert(PtrVT == Ptr.getValueType());
     assert(MemVT == Mask.getValueType());
     if (MemVT != PtrVT)

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94125