[llvm] [GlobalIsel] Combine freeze (PR #93239)
Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 29 05:07:51 PDT 2024
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>,
Thorsten =?utf-8?q?Schütt?= <schuett at gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93239 at github.com>
================
@@ -1745,18 +1778,55 @@ static bool canCreateUndefOrPoison(Register Reg, const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
UndefPoisonKind Kind) {
MachineInstr *RegDef = MRI.getVRegDef(Reg);
- if (auto *GMI = dyn_cast<GenericMachineInstr>(RegDef)) {
- if (ConsiderFlagsAndMetadata && includesPoison(Kind) &&
- GMI->hasPoisonGeneratingFlags())
- return true;
- } else {
- // Conservatively return true.
- return true;
- }
+ if (ConsiderFlagsAndMetadata && includesPoison(Kind))
+ if (auto *GMI = dyn_cast<GenericMachineInstr>(RegDef))
+ if (GMI->hasPoisonGeneratingFlags())
+ return true;
+ // Check whether opcode is a poison/undef-generating operation.
switch (RegDef->getOpcode()) {
case TargetOpcode::G_FREEZE:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_BUILD_VECTOR:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_CONSTANT_FOLD_BARRIER:
return false;
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SHL:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_ASHR:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_LSHR:
+ return includesPoison(Kind) &&
+ !shiftAmountKnownInRange(RegDef->getOperand(2).getReg(), MRI);
+ case TargetOpcode::G_FPTOSI:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_FPTOUI:
+ // fptosi/ui yields poison if the resulting value does not fit in the
+ // destination type.
+ return true;
+ case TargetOpcode::G_CTLZ:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_CTTZ:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_ABS:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_CTPOP:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_BSWAP:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_BITREVERSE:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_FSHL:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_FSHR:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SMAX:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SMIN:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_UMAX:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_UMIN:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_PTRMASK:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SADDO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SSUBO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_UADDO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_USUBO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SMULO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_UMULO:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SADDSAT:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_UADDSAT:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SSUBSAT:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_USUBSAT:
+ return false;
+ case TargetOpcode::G_SSHLSAT:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_USHLSAT:
+ return includesPoison(Kind) &&
+ !shiftAmountKnownInRange(RegDef->getOperand(2).getReg(), MRI);
----------------
arsenm wrote:
Test doesn't look comprehensive, this for example doesn't seem covered
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93239
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list