[llvm] Upstream libc++ buildbot restarter. (PR #93582)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 28 10:14:55 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow
Author: Eric (EricWF)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
I've been running a cronjob on my local machine to restart preempted
libc++ CI runs. This is bad and brittle. This upstreams a much better
version of the restarter.
It works by matching on check run annotations looking for mention
of the machine being shutdown.
If there are both preempted jobs and failing jobs, we don't restart
the workflow. Maybe we should change that?
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93582.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added) .github/workflows/restart-preempted-libcxx-jobs.yaml (+108)
``````````diff
diff --git a/.github/workflows/restart-preempted-libcxx-jobs.yaml b/.github/workflows/restart-preempted-libcxx-jobs.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..3da17b9f85544
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/workflows/restart-preempted-libcxx-jobs.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+name: Restart Preempted Libc++ Workflow
+
+# The libc++ builders run on preemptable VMs, which can be shutdown at any time.
+# This workflow identifies when a workflow run was canceled due to the VM being preempted,
+# and restarts the workflow run.
+
+# We identify a canceled workflow run by checking the annotations of the check runs in the check suite,
+# which should contain the message "The runner has received a shutdown signal."
+
+# Note: If a job is both preempted and also contains a non-preemption failure, we do not restart the workflow.
+
+on:
+ workflow_run:
+ workflows:
+ - "Build and Test libc\+\+"
+ types:
+ - failure
+ - canceled
+
+permissions:
+ contents: read
+
+jobs:
+ restart:
+ name: "Restart Job"
+ permissions:
+ statuses: read
+ checks: read
+ actions: write
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+ steps:
+ - name: "Restart Job"
+ uses: actions/github-script at 60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea #v7.0.1
+ with:
+ script: |
+ const failure_regex = /Process completed with exit code 1./
+ const preemption_regex = /The runner has received a shutdown signal/
+
+ console.log('Listing check runs for suite')
+ const check_suites = await github.rest.checks.listForSuite({
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
+ check_suite_id: context.payload.workflow_run.check_suite_id
+ })
+
+ check_run_ids = [];
+ for (check_run of check_suites.data.check_runs) {
+ console.log('Checking check run: ' + check_run.id);
+ console.log(check_run);
+ if (check_run.status != 'completed') {
+ console.log('Check run was not completed. Skipping.');
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (check_run.conclusion != 'failure' && check_run.conclusion != 'cancelled') {
+ console.log('Check run had conclusion: ' + check_run.conclusion + '. Skipping.');
+ continue;
+ }
+ check_run_ids.push(check_run.id);
+ }
+
+ has_preempted_job = false;
+
+ for (check_run_id of check_run_ids) {
+ console.log('Listing annotations for check run: ' + check_run_id);
+
+ annotations = await github.rest.checks.listAnnotations({
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
+ check_run_id: check_run_id
+ })
+
+ console.log(annotations);
+ for (annotation of annotations.data) {
+ if (annotation.annotation_level != 'failure') {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ const preemption_match = annotation.message.match(preemption_regex);
+
+ if (preemption_match != null) {
+ console.log('Found preemption message: ' + annotation.message);
+ has_preempted_job = true;
+ }
+
+ const failure_match = annotation.message.match(failure_regex);
+ if (failure_match != null) {
+ // We only want to restart the workflow if all of the failures were due to preemption.
+ // We don't want to restart the workflow if there were other failures.
+ console.log('Choosing not to rerun workflow because we found a non-preemption failure');
+ console.log('Failure message: ' + annotation.message);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!has_preempted_job) {
+ console.log('No preempted jobs found. Not restarting workflow.');
+ return;
+ }
+
+ console.log("Restarted workflow: " + context.payload.workflow_run.id);
+ await github.rest.actions.reRunWorkflowFailedJobs({
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
+ run_id: context.payload.workflow_run.id
+ })
+
+
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93582
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list