[llvm] Reland "[InstCombine] Fold (sub nuw X, (Y << nuw Z)) >>u exact Z --> (X >>u exact Z) sub nuw Y" (PR #93571)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 28 09:22:25 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
This is the same fold as ((X << nuw Z) sub nuw Y) >>u exact Z --> X sub nuw (Y >>u exact Z), but with the sub operands swapped.
Proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/2cRcdx
Relanding https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91386#issuecomment-2133881420, approved by @<!-- -->dtcxzyw
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93571.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp (+11)
- (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/lshr.ll (+27)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
index ba297111d945f..8d0209ccd13ef 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
@@ -1271,6 +1271,17 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitLShr(BinaryOperator &I) {
return NewSub;
}
+ // (sub nuw X, (Y << nuw Z)) >>u exact Z --> (X >>u exact Z) sub nuw Y
+ if (I.isExact() &&
+ match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_NUWSub(m_Value(X),
+ m_NUWShl(m_Value(Y), m_Specific(Op1)))))) {
+ Value *NewLshr = Builder.CreateLShr(X, Op1, "", /*isExact=*/true);
+ auto *NewSub = BinaryOperator::CreateNUWSub(NewLshr, Y);
+ NewSub->setHasNoSignedWrap(
+ cast<OverflowingBinaryOperator>(Op0)->hasNoSignedWrap());
+ return NewSub;
+ }
+
auto isSuitableBinOpcode = [](Instruction::BinaryOps BinOpcode) {
switch (BinOpcode) {
default:
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/lshr.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/lshr.ll
index fa92c1c4b3be4..1e370d960c45d 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/lshr.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/lshr.ll
@@ -466,6 +466,33 @@ define i32 @shl_sub_lshr(i32 %x, i32 %c, i32 %y) {
ret i32 %lshr
}
+define i32 @shl_sub_lshr_reverse(i32 %x, i32 %c, i32 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_sub_lshr_reverse(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = lshr exact i32 [[Y:%.*]], [[C:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LSHR:%.*]] = sub nuw nsw i32 [[TMP1]], [[X:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[LSHR]]
+;
+ %shl = shl nuw i32 %x, %c
+ %sub = sub nuw nsw i32 %y, %shl
+ %lshr = lshr exact i32 %sub, %c
+ ret i32 %lshr
+}
+
+; Negative test
+
+define i32 @shl_sub_lshr_reverse_no_exact(i32 %x, i32 %c, i32 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_sub_lshr_reverse_no_exact(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl nuw i32 [[X:%.*]], [[C:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub nuw nsw i32 [[Y:%.*]], [[SHL]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[LSHR:%.*]] = lshr i32 [[SUB]], [[C]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[LSHR]]
+;
+ %shl = shl nuw i32 %x, %c
+ %sub = sub nuw nsw i32 %y, %shl
+ %lshr = lshr i32 %sub, %c
+ ret i32 %lshr
+}
+
define i32 @shl_or_lshr(i32 %x, i32 %c, i32 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_or_lshr(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = lshr i32 [[Y:%.*]], [[C:%.*]]
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93571
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list