[llvm] [InstCombine] lshr (mul (X, 2^N + 1)), N -> add (X, lshr(X, N)) (PR #90295)

[Yingwei Zheng via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1457,13 +1457,24 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitLShr(BinaryOperator &I) {
 
     const APInt *MulC;
     if (match(Op0, m_NUWMul(m_Value(X), m_APInt(MulC)))) {
-      // Look for a "splat" mul pattern - it replicates bits across each half of
-      // a value, so a right shift is just a mask of the low bits:
-      // lshr i[2N] (mul nuw X, (2^N)+1), N --> and iN X, (2^N)-1
-      // TODO: Generalize to allow more than just half-width shifts?
-      if (BitWidth > 2 && ShAmtC * 2 == BitWidth && (*MulC - 1).isPowerOf2() &&
-          MulC->logBase2() == ShAmtC)
-        return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(X, ConstantInt::get(Ty, *MulC - 2));
+      if (BitWidth > 2 && (*MulC - 1).isPowerOf2() &&
+          MulC->logBase2() == ShAmtC) {
+        // Look for a "splat" mul pattern - it replicates bits across each half
+        // of a value, so a right shift is just a mask of the low bits:
+        // lshr i[2N] (mul nuw X, (2^N)+1), N --> and iN X, (2^N)-1
+        if (ShAmtC * 2 == BitWidth)
+          return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(X, ConstantInt::get(Ty, *MulC - 2));
+
+        // lshr (mul nuw (X, 2^N + 1)), N -> add nuw (X, lshr(X, N))
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:

> `shl nuw %x, 1` implies that %x is not undef. This is because if %x is undef, we can pick a value that makes the shift yield poison. Then we can refine poison with `add %x, %x`.
> 
> TL;DR: `shl nuw undef, 1 -> poison -> add %x, %x`

It makes sense to me. Thank you!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90295