[compiler-rt] Clean up a few tests using clang_lto_profgen (PR #92335)
Jan Voung via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 15 18:54:36 PDT 2024
https://github.com/jvoung created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92335
(1) clang_lto_profgen will add `-flto` (or `-flto=thin`) when `lto_supported`:
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ec36145f58d2cf93d86bc4e3be617ad7d7d8ace7/compiler-rt/test/profile/lit.cfg.py#L67
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/f0b3654701bde1cf7821d60698b42383edaff9f3/compiler-rt/test/lit.common.cfg.py#L775
so we may not need to add `-flto` explicitly (otherwise there is some
confusing about which is used)
(2) two tests use `clang_lto_profgen`, but only one requires `lto`.
It seems like both should require `lto` since it intends to test
`clang_lto_profgen`.
Item (2) may partially help with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90692#issuecomment-2113250317
At the moment, some bots see LLD, but is using an old copy of LLD which
will break if we increase the `ModuleSummaryIndex::BitCodeSummaryVersion`
since the old copy of LLD does not understand the new version.
>From 68cd8a2b528f862a2f02fa2619ab5c9d03454e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung <jvoung at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 01:42:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Clean up a few tests using clang_lto_profgen
(1) clang_lto_profgen will add `-flto` (or `-flto=thin`) when `lto_supported`:
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ec36145f58d2cf93d86bc4e3be617ad7d7d8ace7/compiler-rt/test/profile/lit.cfg.py#L67
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/f0b3654701bde1cf7821d60698b42383edaff9f3/compiler-rt/test/lit.common.cfg.py#L775
so we may not need to add `-flto` explicitly (otherwise there is some
confusing about which is used)
(2) two tests use `clang_lto_profgen`, but only one requires `lto`.
It seems like both should require `lto` since it intends to test
`clang_lto_profgen`.
Item (2) may partially help with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90692#issuecomment-2113250317
At the moment, some bots see LLD, but is using an old copy of LLD which
will break if we increase the `ModuleSummaryIndex::BitCodeSummaryVersion`
since the old copy of LLD does not understand the new version.
---
compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c | 2 +-
compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-gc-sections.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c b/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c
index 79182938b10aa..431c9e8f9d48d 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-darwin-dead-strip.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
// RUN: otool -V -s __DATA __llvm_prf_names %t | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=PRF_NAMES
// RUN: otool -V -s __DATA __llvm_prf_cnts %t | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=PRF_CNTS
-// RUN: %clang_lto_profgen=%t.lto.profraw -fcoverage-mapping -mllvm -enable-name-compression=false -DCODE=1 -Wl,-dead_strip -flto -o %t.lto %s
+// RUN: %clang_lto_profgen=%t.lto.profraw -fcoverage-mapping -mllvm -enable-name-compression=false -DCODE=1 -Wl,-dead_strip -o %t.lto %s
// RUN: %run %t.lto
// RUN: llvm-profdata merge -o %t.lto.profdata %t.lto.profraw
// RUN: llvm-profdata show --all-functions %t.lto.profdata | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=PROF
diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-gc-sections.c b/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-gc-sections.c
index 8b84c0a242180..5c1425d2fc656 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-gc-sections.c
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-gc-sections.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// REQUIRES: linux, lld-available
+// REQUIRES: linux, lld-available, lto
// FIXME: Investigate and fix.
// XFAIL: powerpc64-target-arch
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
// RUN: llvm-size -A %t | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=PRF_CNTS
// RUN: rm -rf %t.lto.profraw
-// RUN: %clang_lto_profgen=%t.lto.profraw -fuse-ld=lld -fcoverage-mapping -mllvm -enable-name-compression=false -DCODE=1 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--gc-sections -flto -o %t.lto %s
+// RUN: %clang_lto_profgen=%t.lto.profraw -fuse-ld=lld -fcoverage-mapping -mllvm -enable-name-compression=false -DCODE=1 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--gc-sections -o %t.lto %s
// RUN: %run %t.lto
// RUN: llvm-profdata merge -o %t.lto.profdata %t.lto.profraw
// RUN: llvm-profdata show --all-functions %t.lto.profdata | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=PROF
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list