[llvm] [VPlan] Simplify (X && Y) || (X && !Y) -> X. (PR #89386)

[via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -192,6 +191,47 @@ using AllBinaryRecipe_match =
     BinaryRecipe_match<Op0_t, Op1_t, Opcode, VPWidenRecipe, VPReplicateRecipe,
                        VPWidenCastRecipe, VPInstruction>;
 
+template <typename Op0_t, typename Op1_t, unsigned Opcode, bool Commutable,
+          typename... RecipeTys>
+struct LogicalRecipe_match {
+  Op0_t LHS;
+  Op1_t RHS;
+
+  LogicalRecipe_match(Op0_t LHS, Op1_t RHS) : LHS(LHS), RHS(RHS) {}
+
+  bool match(const VPValue *V) {
+    auto *DefR = V->getDefiningRecipe();
+    return DefR && match(DefR);
+  }
+
+  bool match(const VPSingleDefRecipe *R) {
+    return match(static_cast<const VPRecipeBase *>(R));
+  }
+
+  bool match(const VPRecipeBase *R) {
+    if (!detail::MatchRecipeAndOpcode<Opcode, RecipeTys...>::match(R)) {
+      if (!detail::MatchRecipeAndOpcode<Instruction::Select,
+                                        RecipeTys...>::match(R))
+        return false;
+      if (Opcode == Instruction::And) {
+        if (!m_False().match(R->getOperand(2)))
----------------
ayalz wrote:

Trying to see why the above "Trying the match constant with unexpected bitwidth" assert needs to be relaxed into a check, when applied to m_False/m_True whose operand is still expected to be boolean?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89386