[llvm] [ARM/X86] Standardize the isEligibleForTailCallOptimization prototypes (PR #90688)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 1f44a0b1ff2daebe10b9916da228f7c0ba66827c f281b7475b9c3bd1e3e5b52589c2cdf80a6d8cf9 -- llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.h llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLoweringCall.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index b97225cfb0..aa0cbdae21 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -2407,7 +2407,8 @@ ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall(TargetLowering::CallLoweringInfo &CLI,
   }
   if (isTailCall) {
     // Check if it's really possible to do a tail call.
-    isTailCall = IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(CLI, CCInfo, ArgLocs, PreferIndirect);
+    isTailCall =
+        IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(CLI, CCInfo, ArgLocs, PreferIndirect);
 
     if (isTailCall && !getTargetMachine().Options.GuaranteedTailCallOpt &&
         CallConv != CallingConv::Tail && CallConv != CallingConv::SwiftTail)

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90688