[lld] [llvm] [llvm-readelf] Print more information for RELR (PR #89162)

[Fangrui Song via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -3926,13 +3930,85 @@ template <class ELFT> void GNUELFDumper<ELFT>::printRelocations() {
     OS << "\nRelocation section '" << Name << "' at offset 0x"
        << utohexstr(Offset, /*LowerCase=*/true) << " contains " << EntriesNum
        << " entries:\n";
-    printRelocHeaderFields<ELFT>(OS, Sec.sh_type, this->Obj.getHeader());
-    this->printRelocationsHelper(Sec);
+
+    if (PrintAsRelr(Sec)) {
+      printRelr(Sec);
+    } else {
+      printRelocHeaderFields<ELFT>(OS, Sec.sh_type, this->Obj.getHeader());
+      this->printRelocationsHelper(Sec);
+    }
   }
   if (!HasRelocSections)
     OS << "\nThere are no relocations in this file.\n";
 }
 
+template <class ELFT> void GNUELFDumper<ELFT>::printRelr(const Elf_Shdr &Sec) {
+  Expected<Elf_Relr_Range> RangeOrErr = this->Obj.relrs(Sec);
+  if (!RangeOrErr) {
+    this->reportUniqueWarning("unable to read relocations from " +
----------------
MaskRay wrote:

This is tested by the existing `BROKEN-GNU-NEXT: warning: '[[FILE]]': unable to read relocations from [[SECNAME]] section with index 1: `.

The message is the same as another one in `ELFDumper<ELFT>::forEachRelocationDo`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89162