[llvm] PS support for erf/erff/erfl. (PR #88412)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

Author: Sunil Srivastava (sks75220)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88412.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp (-3) 
- (modified) llvm/test/tools/llvm-tli-checker/ps4-tli-check.yaml (+17-5) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp
index 9e17dcaa55925d..c62d9daa13ef01 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.cpp
@@ -813,9 +813,6 @@ static void initialize(TargetLibraryInfoImpl &TLI, const Triple &T,
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_cabs);
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_cabsf);
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_cabsl);
-    TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_erf);
-    TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_erff);
-    TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_erfl);
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_ffs);
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_flockfile);
     TLI.setUnavailable(LibFunc_fseeko);
diff --git a/llvm/test/tools/llvm-tli-checker/ps4-tli-check.yaml b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-tli-checker/ps4-tli-check.yaml
index 61caf727b0f96e..46f6a2d0a554ac 100644
--- a/llvm/test/tools/llvm-tli-checker/ps4-tli-check.yaml
+++ b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-tli-checker/ps4-tli-check.yaml
@@ -34,23 +34,23 @@
 #
 # CHECK: << Total TLI yes SDK no:  8
 # CHECK: >> Total TLI no  SDK yes: 0
-# CHECK: == Total TLI yes SDK yes: 235
+# CHECK: == Total TLI yes SDK yes: 238
 #
 # WRONG_DETAIL: << TLI yes SDK no : '_ZdaPv' aka operator delete[](void*)
 # WRONG_DETAIL: >> TLI no  SDK yes: '_ZdaPvj' aka operator delete[](void*, unsigned int)
 # WRONG_DETAIL-COUNT-8: << TLI yes SDK no : {{.*}}__hot_cold_t
 # WRONG_SUMMARY: << Total TLI yes SDK no:  9{{$}}
 # WRONG_SUMMARY: >> Total TLI no  SDK yes: 1{{$}}
-# WRONG_SUMMARY: == Total TLI yes SDK yes: 234
+# WRONG_SUMMARY: == Total TLI yes SDK yes: 237
 #
 ## The -COUNT suffix doesn't care if there are too many matches, so check
 ## the exact count first; the two directives should add up to that.
 ## Yes, this means additions to TLI will fail this test, but the argument
 ## to -COUNT can't be an expression.
-# AVAIL: TLI knows 479 symbols, 243 available
-# AVAIL-COUNT-243: {{^}} available
+# AVAIL: TLI knows 479 symbols, 246 available
+# AVAIL-COUNT-246: {{^}} available
 # AVAIL-NOT:       {{^}} available
-# UNAVAIL-COUNT-236: not available
+# UNAVAIL-COUNT-233: not available
 # UNAVAIL-NOT:       not available
 
 ## This is a large file so it's worth telling lit to stop here.
@@ -347,6 +347,18 @@ DynamicSymbols:
     Type:            STT_FUNC
     Section:         .text
     Binding:         STB_GLOBAL
+  - Name:            erf
+    Type:            STT_FUNC
+    Section:         .text
+    Binding:         STB_GLOBAL
+  - Name:            erff
+    Type:            STT_FUNC
+    Section:         .text
+    Binding:         STB_GLOBAL
+  - Name:            erfl
+    Type:            STT_FUNC
+    Section:         .text
+    Binding:         STB_GLOBAL
   - Name:            exp
     Type:            STT_FUNC
     Section:         .text

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88412