[llvm] [InstCombine] Fold `(icmp eq/ne (or (select cond, 0/NZ, 0/NZ), X), 0)` (PR #88183)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 9 21:06:06 PDT 2024
================
@@ -3487,6 +3487,67 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldICmpBinOpEqualityWithConstant(
Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(BOp0, NotBOC);
return new ICmpInst(Pred, And, NotBOC);
}
+ // (icmp eq (or (select cond, 0, NonZero), Other))
+ // -> (and cond, (icmp eq Other, 0))
+ // (icmp ne (or (select cond, NonZero, 0), Other))
+ // -> (or cond, (icmp ne Other, 0))
+ // (icmp ne (or (select cond, 0, NonZero), Other))
+ // -> (or (not cond), (icmp ne Other, 0))
+ // (icmp eq (or (select cond, NonZero, 0), Other))
+ // -> (and (not cond), (icmp eq Other, 0))
+ Value *Cond, *TV, *FV, *Other;
+ if (C.isZero() &&
+ match(BO, m_c_Or(m_Select(m_Value(Cond), m_Value(TV), m_Value(FV)),
+ m_Value(Other)))) {
+ const SimplifyQuery Q = SQ.getWithInstruction(&Cmp);
+ auto IsNonZero = [&](Value *V) {
+ return isKnownNonZero(V, Q.DL, /*Depth=*/0, Q.AC, Q.CxtI, Q.DT);
+ };
+ // Easy case is if eq/ne matches whether 0 is trueval/falseval.
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ
+ ? (match(TV, m_SpecificInt(C)) && IsNonZero(FV))
+ : (match(FV, m_SpecificInt(C)) && IsNonZero(TV))) {
+ Value *Cmp = Builder.CreateICmp(
+ Pred, Other, Constant::getNullValue(Other->getType()));
+ return BinaryOperator::Create(
+ Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? Instruction::And : Instruction::Or, Cmp,
+ Cond);
+ }
+ // Harder case is if eq/ne matches whether 0 is falseval/trueval. In this
+ // case we need to invert the select condition so we need to be careful to
+ // avoid creating extra instructions.
----------------
goldsteinn wrote:
I'm happy to replace the `canFreelyInvertAllUses`/`freelyInvertAlluses` with just `getFreelyInverted`. @dtcxzyw does that cover the case you saw?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88183
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list