[llvm] [AMDGPU] Fix a potential wrong return value indicating whether a pass modifies a function (PR #88197)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 9 14:15:33 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Shilei Tian (shiltian)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
When the alloca is too big for vectorization, the function could have already
been modified in previous iteration of the `for` loop.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88197.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPromoteAlloca.cpp (+1-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPromoteAlloca.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPromoteAlloca.cpp
index 6f3cdf54dceec7..c0846b123d1870 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPromoteAlloca.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPromoteAlloca.cpp
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ bool AMDGPUPromoteAllocaImpl::run(Function &F, bool PromoteToLDS) {
if (AllocaCost > VectorizationBudget) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Alloca too big for vectorization: " << *AI
<< "\n");
- return false;
+ return Changed;
}
if (tryPromoteAllocaToVector(*AI)) {
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88197
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list