[llvm] This patch reverts the fix added in #85218 in favour of a better approach (PR #88118)

[Akash Banerjee via llvm-commits]

TIFitis wrote:

@jdoerfert @skatrak I believe @jsjodin is working on a patch which is a more general approach for codegen of target constructs nested within host operations. Once that patch is upstream, I'll merge this to get rid of the placeholder fix we have.

Does that sound reasonable?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88118