[llvm] [RISCV] Fix and refactor Zvk sched classes (PR #86519)

[Michael Maitland via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -281,59 +275,44 @@ multiclass VPseudoVALU_V_S_NoMask_Zvk
 multiclass VPseudoVALU_VV_NoMask_Zvk {
   foreach m = MxListVF4 in {
     defvar mx = m.MX;
-    defvar WriteVIALUV_MX = !cast<SchedWrite>("WriteVIALUV_" # mx);
-    defvar ReadVIALUV_MX = !cast<SchedRead>("ReadVIALUV_" # mx);
-
     defm _VV : VPseudoTernaryNoMask_Zvk<m.vrclass, m.vrclass, m.vrclass, m>,
-               Sched<[WriteVIALUV_MX, ReadVIALUV_MX, ReadVIALUV_MX, ReadVMask]>;
+               SchedTernary<"WriteVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", mx>;
   }
 }
 
 multiclass VPseudoVALU_VI_NoMask_Zvk {
   foreach m = MxListVF4 in {
     defvar mx = m.MX;
-    defvar WriteVIALUV_MX = !cast<SchedWrite>("WriteVIALUV_" # mx);
-    defvar ReadVIALUV_MX = !cast<SchedRead>("ReadVIALUV_" # mx);
-
     defm _VI : VPseudoTernaryNoMask_Zvk<m.vrclass, m.vrclass, uimm5, m>,
-               Sched<[WriteVIALUV_MX, ReadVIALUV_MX, ReadVIALUV_MX, ReadVMask]>;
+               SchedTernary<"WriteVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", "ReadVIALUV", mx>;
   }
 }
 
 multiclass VPseudoVALU_VI_NoMaskTU_Zvk {
----------------
michaelmaitland wrote:

It feels wrong to call this TU but not have a merge operand. Everyone else who uses `VPseudoBinaryNoMask` does not read merge op in RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos. Is TU a bad name here? vaeskf1 uses this class and according to the spec, it does not look like it reads vd it just does `set_velem(vd, EGW=128, i, w[3:0]);` 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86519