[llvm] 131be5d - [RISCV] Add more disjoint or tests for vwadd[u].{w, v}v. NFC
Luke Lau via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 29 04:11:36 PDT 2024
Author: Luke Lau
Date: 2024-03-29T19:11:26+08:00
New Revision: 131be5de90dac9f54a8213a1aab66a75c62890ec
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/131be5de90dac9f54a8213a1aab66a75c62890ec
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/131be5de90dac9f54a8213a1aab66a75c62890ec.diff
LOG: [RISCV] Add more disjoint or tests for vwadd[u].{w,v}v. NFC
Added:
Modified:
llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vwadd-sdnode.ll
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vwadd-sdnode.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vwadd-sdnode.ll
index 36bc10f055b84b..ed12afdd95956e 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vwadd-sdnode.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vwadd-sdnode.ll
@@ -1396,8 +1396,8 @@ define <vscale x 1 x i64> @i1_zext(<vscale x 1 x i1> %va, <vscale x 1 x i64> %vb
; %x.i32 and %y.i32 are disjoint, so DAGCombiner will combine it into an or.
; FIXME: We should be able to recover the or into vwaddu.vv if the disjoint
; flag is set.
-define <vscale x 2 x i32> @disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i8> %x.i8, <vscale x 2 x i8> %y.i8) {
-; CHECK-LABEL: disjoint_or:
+define <vscale x 2 x i32> @vwaddu_vv_disjoint_or_add(<vscale x 2 x i8> %x.i8, <vscale x 2 x i8> %y.i8) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vwaddu_vv_disjoint_or_add:
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli a0, zero, e16, mf2, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vzext.vf2 v10, v8
@@ -1414,3 +1414,59 @@ define <vscale x 2 x i32> @disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i8> %x.i8, <vscale x 2 x i8
%add = add <vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, %y.i32
ret <vscale x 2 x i32> %add
}
+
+; TODO: We could select vwaddu.vv, but when both arms of the or are the same
+; DAGCombiner::hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands moves the zext above the or.
+define <vscale x 2 x i32> @vwaddu_vv_disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i16> %x.i16, <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vwaddu_vv_disjoint_or:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli a0, zero, e16, mf2, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vor.vv v9, v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, zero, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vzext.vf2 v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %x.i32 = zext <vscale x 2 x i16> %x.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %y.i32 = zext <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %or = or disjoint <vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, %y.i32
+ ret <vscale x 2 x i32> %or
+}
+
+; TODO: We could select vwadd.vv, but when both arms of the or are the same
+; DAGCombiner::hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands moves the zext above the or.
+define <vscale x 2 x i32> @vwadd_vv_disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i16> %x.i16, <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vwadd_vv_disjoint_or:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli a0, zero, e16, mf2, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vor.vv v9, v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, zero, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsext.vf2 v8, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %x.i32 = sext <vscale x 2 x i16> %x.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %y.i32 = sext <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %or = or disjoint <vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, %y.i32
+ ret <vscale x 2 x i32> %or
+}
+
+define <vscale x 2 x i32> @vwaddu_wv_disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vwaddu_wv_disjoint_or:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli a0, zero, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vzext.vf2 v10, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: vor.vv v8, v8, v10
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %y.i32 = zext <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %or = or disjoint <vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, %y.i32
+ ret <vscale x 2 x i32> %or
+}
+
+define <vscale x 2 x i32> @vwadd_wv_disjoint_or(<vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vwadd_wv_disjoint_or:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli a0, zero, e32, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsext.vf2 v10, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT: vor.vv v8, v8, v10
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %y.i32 = sext <vscale x 2 x i16> %y.i16 to <vscale x 2 x i32>
+ %or = or disjoint <vscale x 2 x i32> %x.i32, %y.i32
+ ret <vscale x 2 x i32> %or
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list