[llvm] [RemoveDIs] Add additional debug-mode verifier checks (PR #84308)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 7 03:30:28 PST 2024
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff e4882d83d77f9d6a5198ecb7faabd5bf2ce4b730 c195081e5fb8747367dac38af4566e40619c139d -- llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
index e6e617cc40..951ccc1a8c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
@@ -2675,9 +2675,8 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(const Function &F) {
"Attribute after last parameter!", &F);
Check(F.IsNewDbgInfoFormat == F.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat,
- "Fn debug format should match parent", &F,
- F.IsNewDbgInfoFormat, F.getParent(),
- F.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat);
+ "Fn debug format should match parent", &F, F.IsNewDbgInfoFormat,
+ F.getParent(), F.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat);
bool IsIntrinsic = F.isIntrinsic();
@@ -3023,9 +3022,8 @@ void Verifier::visitBasicBlock(BasicBlock &BB) {
}
Check(BB.IsNewDbgInfoFormat == BB.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat,
- "BB debug format should match parent", &BB,
- BB.IsNewDbgInfoFormat, BB.getParent(),
- BB.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat);
+ "BB debug format should match parent", &BB, BB.IsNewDbgInfoFormat,
+ BB.getParent(), BB.getParent()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat);
// Confirm that no issues arise from the debug program.
if (BB.IsNewDbgInfoFormat)
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84308
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list