[llvm] [Support][NFC] Add test documenting that empty `Regex` pattern matches nothing. (PR #83849)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support

Author: None (martinboehme)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

I was wondering about this when I recently used `Regex`, and I thought it would
be nice to have a test documenting this behavior.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83849.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/unittests/Support/RegexTest.cpp (+8) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Support/RegexTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Support/RegexTest.cpp
index 09f674bb209c07..c6ac42591d1fc7 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Support/RegexTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Support/RegexTest.cpp
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ TEST_F(RegexTest, Basics) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(r5.match(String));
 }
 
+TEST_F(RegexTest, EmptyPattern) {
+  // The empty pattern doesn't match anything -- not even the empty string.
+  // (This is different from some other regex implementations.)
+  Regex r("");
+  EXPECT_FALSE(r.match("123"));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(r.match(""));
+}
+
 TEST_F(RegexTest, Backreferences) {
   Regex r1("([a-z]+)_\\1");
   SmallVector<StringRef, 4> Matches;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83849