[llvm] [RISCV] Take SEW/LMUL into account for value tracking of vsetvli[max] (PR #82163)
Craig Topper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 18 11:56:51 PST 2024
================
@@ -1576,12 +1577,30 @@ static void computeKnownBitsFromOperator(const Operator *I,
Known.Zero.setBitsFrom(32);
break;
case Intrinsic::riscv_vsetvli:
- case Intrinsic::riscv_vsetvlimax:
- // Assume that VL output is <= 65536.
- // TODO: Take SEW and LMUL into account.
- if (BitWidth > 17)
- Known.Zero.setBitsFrom(17);
+ case Intrinsic::riscv_vsetvlimax: {
+ bool HasAVL = II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::riscv_vsetvli;
+ const ConstantRange &Range =
+ getVScaleRange(II->getFunction(), BitWidth);
+ uint64_t SEW =
+ 1 << (cast<ConstantInt>(II->getArgOperand(HasAVL))->getZExtValue() +
+ 3);
+ uint64_t LMUL =
+ cast<ConstantInt>(II->getArgOperand(1 + HasAVL))->getZExtValue();
+ bool Fractional = LMUL > 4;
+ uint64_t MaxVL =
+ Range.getLower().getZExtValue() * RISCV::RVVBitsPerBlock / SEW;
+ MaxVL = Fractional ? MaxVL / (1 << (8 - LMUL)) : MaxVL * (1 << LMUL);
+
+ // Result of vsetvli must be not larger than AVL.
+ if (HasAVL)
+ if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(II->getArgOperand(0)))
+ MaxVL = std::min(MaxVL, CI->getZExtValue());
----------------
topperc wrote:
If AVL is less than the MaxVL, which is the lower bound on VL), then the known bits are exactly the AVL.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82163
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list