[compiler-rt] [llvm] [TypeProf][InstrPGO] Introduce raw and instr profile format change for type profiling. (PR #81691)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 15 15:46:26 PST 2024
================
@@ -273,18 +280,28 @@ lprofWriteDataImpl(ProfDataWriter *Writer, const __llvm_profile_data *DataBegin,
const uint64_t NumBitmapBytes =
__llvm_profile_get_num_bitmap_bytes(BitmapBegin, BitmapEnd);
const uint64_t NamesSize = __llvm_profile_get_name_size(NamesBegin, NamesEnd);
+ const uint64_t NumVTables =
+ __llvm_profile_get_num_vtable(VTableBegin, VTableEnd);
+ const uint64_t VTableSectionSize =
+ __llvm_profile_get_vtable_section_size(VTableBegin, VTableEnd);
+ const uint64_t VNamesSize =
+ __llvm_profile_get_name_size(VNamesBegin, VNamesEnd);
/* Create the header. */
__llvm_profile_header Header;
/* Determine how much padding is needed before/after the counters and after
* the names. */
uint64_t PaddingBytesBeforeCounters, PaddingBytesAfterCounters,
- PaddingBytesAfterNames, PaddingBytesAfterBitmapBytes;
- __llvm_profile_get_padding_sizes_for_counters(
- DataSectionSize, CountersSectionSize, NumBitmapBytes, NamesSize,
- &PaddingBytesBeforeCounters, &PaddingBytesAfterCounters,
- &PaddingBytesAfterBitmapBytes, &PaddingBytesAfterNames);
+ PaddingBytesAfterBitmapBytes, PaddingBytesAfterNames,
+ PaddingBytesAfterVTable, PaddingBytesAfterVNames;
+ if (__llvm_profile_get_padding_sizes_for_counters(
----------------
modiking wrote:
`__llvm_profile_get_padding_sizes_for_counters` return both `0` and `-1` on failure and this here is only checking for -1. Is that intentional?
If the tri-state is needed I would be very explicit on having an enum for `success`, `failure`, or `error`. Otherwise, would 2 states be enough?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81691
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list