[llvm] [SelectionDAG] Introducing the SelectionDAG pattern matching framework (PR #78654)
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 13 08:35:25 PST 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,712 @@
+//==--------------- llvm/CodeGen/SDPatternMatch.h ---------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+/// \file
+/// Contains matchers for matching SelectionDAG nodes and values.
+///
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CODEGEN_SDPATTERNMATCH_H
+#define LLVM_CODEGEN_SDPATTERNMATCH_H
+
+#include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetLowering.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+namespace SDPatternMatch {
+
+/// MatchContext can repurpose existing patterns to behave differently under
+/// a certain context. For instance, `m_Opc(ISD::ADD)` matches plain ADD nodes
+/// in normal circumstances, but matches VP_ADD nodes under a custom
+/// VPMatchContext. This design is meant to facilitate code / pattern reusing.
+class BasicMatchContext {
+ const SelectionDAG *DAG;
+ const TargetLowering *TLI;
+
+public:
+ explicit BasicMatchContext(const SelectionDAG *DAG)
+ : DAG(DAG), TLI(DAG ? &DAG->getTargetLoweringInfo() : nullptr) {}
+
+ explicit BasicMatchContext(const TargetLowering *TLI)
+ : DAG(nullptr), TLI(TLI) {}
+
+ // A valid MatchContext has to implement the following functions.
+
+ const SelectionDAG *getDAG() const { return DAG; }
+
+ const TargetLowering *getTLI() const {
+ if (TLI)
+ return TLI;
+ return DAG ? &DAG->getTargetLoweringInfo() : nullptr;
+ }
+
+ // Optional trait function(s)
+
+ /// Return true if N effectively has opcode Opcode.
+ // bool match(SDValue N, unsigned Opcode)
+};
+
+template <typename MatchContext>
+using ctx_has_get_dag = decltype(std::declval<const MatchContext &>().getDAG());
+
+template <typename MatchContext>
+using ctx_has_get_tli = decltype(std::declval<const MatchContext &>().getTLI());
+
+template <typename MatchContext>
+using ctx_has_match = decltype(std::declval<const MatchContext &>().match(
+ std::declval<SDValue>(), std::declval<unsigned>()));
+
+template <typename Pattern, typename MatchContext>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_context_match(SDValue N, const MatchContext &Ctx,
+ Pattern &&P) {
+ static_assert(is_detected<ctx_has_get_dag, MatchContext>::value,
+ "Match context has to implement getDAG().");
+ static_assert(is_detected<ctx_has_get_tli, MatchContext>::value,
+ "Match context has to implement getTLI().");
+ return P.match(Ctx, N);
+}
+
+template <typename Pattern, typename MatchContext>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_context_match(SDNode *N, const MatchContext &Ctx,
+ Pattern &&P) {
+ return sd_context_match(SDValue(N, 0), Ctx, P);
+}
+
+template <typename Pattern>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_match(SDNode *N, const SelectionDAG *DAG, Pattern &&P) {
+ return sd_context_match(N, BasicMatchContext(DAG), P);
+}
+
+template <typename Pattern>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_match(SDValue N, const SelectionDAG *DAG, Pattern &&P) {
+ return sd_context_match(N, BasicMatchContext(DAG), P);
+}
+
+template <typename Pattern>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_match(SDNode *N, Pattern &&P) {
+ return sd_match(N, nullptr, P);
+}
+
+template <typename Pattern>
+[[nodiscard]] bool sd_match(SDValue N, Pattern &&P) {
+ return sd_match(N, nullptr, P);
+}
+
+// === Utilities ===
+struct Value_match {
+ SDValue MatchVal;
+
+ Value_match() = default;
+
+ explicit Value_match(SDValue Match) : MatchVal(Match) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext> bool match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ return (MatchVal && (MatchVal == N)) || N.getNode();
+ }
+};
+
+/// Match any valid SDValue.
+inline Value_match m_Value() { return Value_match(); }
+
+inline Value_match m_Specific(SDValue N) { return Value_match(N); }
+
+struct Opcode_match {
+ unsigned Opcode;
+
+ explicit Opcode_match(unsigned Opc) : Opcode(Opc) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ std::enable_if_t<is_detected<ctx_has_match, MatchContext>::value, bool>
+ match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ return N && Ctx.match(N, Opcode);
+ }
+
+ // Default implementation.
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ std::enable_if_t<!is_detected<ctx_has_match, MatchContext>::value, bool>
+ match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ return N && N->getOpcode() == Opcode;
+ }
+};
+
+inline Opcode_match m_Opc(unsigned Opcode) { return Opcode_match(Opcode); }
+
+template <unsigned NumUses, typename Pattern> struct NUses_match {
+ Pattern P;
+
+ explicit NUses_match(const Pattern &P) : P(P) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ // SDNode::hasNUsesOfValue is pretty expensive when the SDNode produces
+ // multiple results, hence we check the subsequent pattern here before
+ // checking the number of value users.
+ return N && P.match(Ctx, N) && N->hasNUsesOfValue(NumUses, N.getResNo());
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline NUses_match<1, Pattern> m_OneUse(const Pattern &P) {
+ return NUses_match<1, Pattern>(P);
+}
+template <unsigned N, typename Pattern>
+inline NUses_match<N, Pattern> m_NUses(const Pattern &P) {
+ return NUses_match<N, Pattern>(P);
+}
+
+inline NUses_match<1, Value_match> m_OneUse() {
+ return NUses_match<1, Value_match>(m_Value());
+}
+template <unsigned N> inline NUses_match<N, Value_match> m_NUses() {
+ return NUses_match<N, Value_match>(m_Value());
+}
+
+struct Value_bind {
+ SDValue &BindVal;
+
+ explicit Value_bind(SDValue &N) : BindVal(N) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext> bool match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ if (N) {
+ BindVal = N;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+};
+
+inline Value_bind m_Value(SDValue &N) { return Value_bind(N); }
+
+template <typename Pattern> struct TLI_pred_match {
+ Pattern P;
+ std::function<bool(const TargetLowering &, SDValue)> PredFunc;
+
+ TLI_pred_match(decltype(PredFunc) &&Pred, const Pattern &P)
+ : P(P), PredFunc(std::move(Pred)) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ return Ctx.getTLI() && N && PredFunc(*Ctx.getTLI(), N) && P.match(Ctx, N);
+ }
+};
+
+/// Match legal SDNodes based on the information provided by TargetLowering.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline TLI_pred_match<Pattern> m_LegalOp(const Pattern &P) {
+ return TLI_pred_match<Pattern>(
+ [](const TargetLowering &TLI, SDValue N) {
+ return TLI.isOperationLegal(N->getOpcode(), N.getValueType());
+ },
+ P);
+}
+
+/// Switch to a different MatchContext for subsequent patterns.
+template <typename NewMatchContext, typename Pattern> struct SwitchContext {
+ const NewMatchContext &Ctx;
+ Pattern P;
+
+ template <typename OrigMatchContext>
+ bool match(const OrigMatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ return P.match(Ctx, N);
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename MatchContext, typename Pattern>
+inline SwitchContext<MatchContext, Pattern> m_Context(const MatchContext &Ctx,
+ Pattern &&P) {
+ return SwitchContext<MatchContext, Pattern>{Ctx, std::move(P)};
+}
+
+// === Value type ===
+struct ValueType_bind {
+ EVT &BindVT;
+
+ explicit ValueType_bind(EVT &Bind) : BindVT(Bind) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext> bool match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ if (!N)
+ return false;
+ BindVT = N.getValueType();
+ return true;
+ }
+};
+
+/// Retreive the ValueType of the current SDValue.
+inline ValueType_bind m_VT(EVT &VT) { return ValueType_bind(VT); }
+
+template <typename Pattern> struct ValueType_match {
+ std::function<bool(EVT)> PredFunc;
+ Pattern P;
+
+ ValueType_match(decltype(PredFunc) &&Pred, const Pattern &P)
+ : PredFunc(std::move(Pred)), P(P) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ return N && PredFunc(N.getValueType()) && P.match(Ctx, N);
+ }
+};
+
+/// Match a specific ValueType.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_SpecificVT(EVT RefVT, const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>([=](EVT VT) { return VT == RefVT; }, P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_SpecificVT(EVT RefVT) {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>([=](EVT VT) { return VT == RefVT; },
+ m_Value());
+}
+
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_Glue() { return m_SpecificVT(MVT::Glue); }
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_OtherVT() {
+ return m_SpecificVT(MVT::Other);
+}
+
+/// Match any integer ValueTypes.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_IntegerVT(const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isInteger(); }, P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_IntegerVT() {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isInteger(); },
+ m_Value());
+}
+
+/// Match any floating point ValueTypes.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_FloatingPointVT(const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isFloatingPoint(); },
+ P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_FloatingPointVT() {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>(
+ [](EVT VT) { return VT.isFloatingPoint(); }, m_Value());
+}
+
+/// Match any vector ValueTypes.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_VectorVT(const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isVector(); }, P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_VectorVT() {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isVector(); },
+ m_Value());
+}
+
+/// Match fixed-length vector ValueTypes.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_FixedVectorVT(const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>(
+ [](EVT VT) { return VT.isFixedLengthVector(); }, P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_FixedVectorVT() {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>(
+ [](EVT VT) { return VT.isFixedLengthVector(); }, m_Value());
+}
+
+/// Match scalable vector ValueTypes.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline ValueType_match<Pattern> m_ScalableVectorVT(const Pattern &P) {
+ return ValueType_match<Pattern>([](EVT VT) { return VT.isScalableVector(); },
+ P);
+}
+inline ValueType_match<Value_match> m_ScalableVectorVT() {
+ return ValueType_match<Value_match>(
+ [](EVT VT) { return VT.isScalableVector(); }, m_Value());
+}
+
+/// Match legal ValueTypes based on the information provided by TargetLowering.
+template <typename Pattern>
+inline TLI_pred_match<Pattern> m_LegalType(const Pattern &P) {
+ return TLI_pred_match<Pattern>(
+ [](const TargetLowering &TLI, SDValue N) {
+ return TLI.isTypeLegal(N.getValueType());
+ },
+ P);
+}
+
+// === Patterns combinators ===
+template <typename... Preds> struct And {
+ template <typename MatchContext> bool match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ return true;
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename Pred, typename... Preds>
+struct And<Pred, Preds...> : And<Preds...> {
+ Pred P;
+ And(Pred &&p, Preds &&...preds)
+ : And<Preds...>(std::forward<Preds>(preds)...), P(std::forward<Pred>(p)) {
+ }
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ return P.match(Ctx, N) && And<Preds...>::match(Ctx, N);
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename... Preds> struct Or {
+ template <typename MatchContext> bool match(const MatchContext &, SDValue N) {
+ return false;
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename Pred, typename... Preds>
+struct Or<Pred, Preds...> : Or<Preds...> {
+ Pred P;
+ Or(Pred &&p, Preds &&...preds)
+ : Or<Preds...>(std::forward<Preds>(preds)...), P(std::forward<Pred>(p)) {}
+
+ template <typename MatchContext>
+ bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+ return P.match(Ctx, N) || Or<Preds...>::match(Ctx, N);
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename... Preds> And<Preds...> m_all_of(Preds &&...preds) {
----------------
nikic wrote:
Naming here is a bit inconsistent with everything else -- should be `m_AllOf`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78654
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list