[llvm] [NVPTX] Add support for calling aliases (PR #81170)

Artem Belevich via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 8 13:47:00 PST 2024


================
@@ -24,18 +50,12 @@ attributes #0 = { noreturn }
 ;      CHECK: .visible .func noreturn()
 ; CHECK-NEXT: .noreturn
 
-;      CHECK: .visible .func  (.param .b32 func_retval0) b();
-; CHECK-NEXT: .alias b, a;
+;      CHECK: .visible .func  (.param .b32 func_retval0) z()
+;      CHECK:      call.uni (retval0), 
+; CHECK-NEXT:      b,
 
-;      CHECK: .visible .func  (.param .b32 func_retval0) c();
-; CHECK-NEXT: .alias c, a;
 
-;      CHECK: .visible .func bar(
-; CHECK-NEXT:         .param .b32 foo_param_0,
-; CHECK-NEXT:         .param .b64 foo_param_1
-; CHECK-NEXT: );
-; CHECK-NEXT: .alias bar, foo;
-
-;      CHECK: .visible .func noreturn_alias()
-; CHECK-NEXT: .noreturn;
-; CHECK-NEXT: .alias noreturn_alias, noreturn;
+; CHECK: .alias b, a;
+; CHECK: .alias c, a;
----------------
Artem-B wrote:

Are we allowed to have alias of an alias in PTX or IR? 

If IR allows it, it may be good to have a case demonstrating what we expect to see in PTX for that. An alias to the completely resolved target? Or an alias of an alias.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81170


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list