[llvm] [ValueTracking] Compute known FPClass from dominating condition (PR #80740)

Yingwei Zheng via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 6 21:01:19 PST 2024


================
@@ -4213,9 +4213,56 @@ llvm::fcmpImpliesClass(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, const Function &F, Value *LHS,
   return fcmpImpliesClass(Pred, F, LHS, *ConstRHS, LookThroughSrc);
 }
 
-static FPClassTest computeKnownFPClassFromAssumes(const Value *V,
-                                                  const SimplifyQuery &Q) {
-  FPClassTest KnownFromAssume = fcAllFlags;
+static KnownFPClass computeKnownFPClassFromContext(const Value *V,
+                                                   const SimplifyQuery &Q) {
+  KnownFPClass KnownFromContext;
+
+  if (!Q.CxtI)
+    return KnownFromContext;
+
+  if (Q.DC && Q.DT) {
+    auto computeKnownFPClassFromCmp = [&](CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *LHS,
+                                          Value *RHS) {
+      if (match(LHS, m_BitCast(m_Specific(V)))) {
+        Type *SrcType = V->getType();
+        Type *DstType = LHS->getType();
+
+        // Make sure the bitcast doesn't change between scalar and vector and
+        // doesn't change the number of vector elements.
+        if (SrcType->isVectorTy() == DstType->isVectorTy() &&
+            SrcType->getScalarSizeInBits() == DstType->getScalarSizeInBits()) {
+          // TODO: move IsSignBitCheck to ValueTracking
+          if ((Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && match(RHS, m_Zero())) ||
+              (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE && match(RHS, m_AllOnes())))
+            KnownFromContext.signBitMustBeOne();
+          else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT && match(RHS, m_AllOnes()) ||
+                   (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE && match(RHS, m_Zero())))
+            KnownFromContext.signBitMustBeZero();
+        }
+      }
+    };
+
+    // Handle dominating conditions.
+    for (BranchInst *BI : Q.DC->conditionsFor(V)) {
+      // TODO: handle fcmps
+      auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(BI->getCondition());
+      if (!Cmp)
+        continue;
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:

> It seems like we cannot benefit from dominating fcmps :( Could you please provide some test cases?

Sorry, I forgot to handle fcmps/is.fpclass in `DomConditionCache`.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80740


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list