[llvm] [ARM] Use VT vector size, not the array size (PR #79370)

David Green via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 24 23:51:57 PST 2024

Previous message: [llvm] [ARM] Use VT vector size, not the array size (PR #79370)
Next message: [llvm] [AArch64][SVE] Handle some cases of uzp1/reinterpret from svbool in isZeroingInactiveLanes (PR #78623)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

davemgreen wrote:

Can you explain why you think the new costs are better?
The test seems to crash

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79370

Previous message: [llvm] [ARM] Use VT vector size, not the array size (PR #79370)
Next message: [llvm] [AArch64][SVE] Handle some cases of uzp1/reinterpret from svbool in isZeroingInactiveLanes (PR #78623)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list