[llvm] Fix an assert failure with a funclet in a swifttailcc function. (PR #78806)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 0388ab3e29de843dea823b6ef0c6d0ccc56b0a16 c48744e27619ab154231e3ac4a10019955a27992 -- llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp
index 01f0681ba3..6918f29822 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp
@@ -2591,9 +2591,10 @@ StackOffset AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(
         // function.
         (void) Subtarget;
         // swifttailcc uses FP
-        assert((Subtarget.isCallingConvWin64(MF.getFunction().getCallingConv()) ||
-                MF.getFunction().getCallingConv() == CallingConv::SwiftTail) &&
-               "Funclets should only be present on Win64 or swifttailcc");
+        assert(
+            (Subtarget.isCallingConvWin64(MF.getFunction().getCallingConv()) ||
+             MF.getFunction().getCallingConv() == CallingConv::SwiftTail) &&
+            "Funclets should only be present on Win64 or swifttailcc");
         UseFP = true;
       } else {
         // We have the choice between FP and (SP or BP).

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78806