[llvm] [NewPM][CodeGen][llc] Add NPM support (PR #70922)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 18 03:03:30 PST 2024


================
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+//===- NewPMDriver.cpp - Driver for llc using new PM ----------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+/// \file
+///
+/// This file is just a split of the code that logically belongs in llc.cpp but
+/// that includes the new pass manager headers.
+///
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "NewPMDriver.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/CodeGenPassBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/CommandFlags.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MIRParser/MIRParser.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MIRPrinter.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachinePassManager.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetPassConfig.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticPrinter.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IRPrintingPasses.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Verifier.h"
+#include "llvm/IRReader/IRReader.h"
+#include "llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/Passes/StandardInstrumentations.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Error.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/FormattedStream.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/WithColor.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/CGPassBuilderOption.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+extern cl::opt<bool> PrintPipelinePasses;
+} // namespace llvm
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+static cl::opt<RegAllocType> RegAlloc(
+    "regalloc-npm", cl::desc("Register allocator to use for new pass manager"),
+    cl::Hidden, cl::ValueOptional, cl::init(RegAllocType::Default),
+    cl::values(
+        clEnumValN(RegAllocType::Default, "default",
+                   "pick register allocator based on -O option"),
+        clEnumValN(RegAllocType::Basic, "basic", "basic register allocator"),
+        clEnumValN(RegAllocType::Fast, "fast", "fast register allocator"),
+        clEnumValN(RegAllocType::Greedy, "greedy", "greedy register allocator"),
+        clEnumValN(RegAllocType::PBQP, "pbqp", "PBQP register allocator")));
+
+static cl::opt<bool>
+    DebugPM("debug-pass-manager", cl::Hidden,
+            cl::desc("Print pass management debugging information"));
+
+bool LLCDiagnosticHandler::handleDiagnostics(const DiagnosticInfo &DI) {
+  DiagnosticHandler::handleDiagnostics(DI);
+  if (DI.getKind() == llvm::DK_SrcMgr) {
+    const auto &DISM = cast<DiagnosticInfoSrcMgr>(DI);
+    const SMDiagnostic &SMD = DISM.getSMDiag();
+
+    SMD.print(nullptr, errs());
+
+    // For testing purposes, we print the LocCookie here.
+    if (DISM.isInlineAsmDiag() && DISM.getLocCookie())
+      WithColor::note() << "!srcloc = " << DISM.getLocCookie() << "\n";
+
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  if (auto *Remark = dyn_cast<DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase>(&DI))
+    if (!Remark->isEnabled())
+      return true;
+
+  DiagnosticPrinterRawOStream DP(errs());
+  errs() << LLVMContext::getDiagnosticMessagePrefix(DI.getSeverity()) << ": ";
+  DI.print(DP);
+  errs() << "\n";
+  return true;
+}
+
+static llvm::ExitOnError ExitOnErr;
+
+static void RunPasses(bool BOS, ToolOutputFile *Out, Module *M,
+                      LLVMContext &Context, SmallString<0> &Buffer,
+                      ModulePassManager *MPM, ModuleAnalysisManager *MAM,
+                      MachineFunctionPassManager &MFPM,
+                      MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &MFAM) {
+  assert(M && "invalid input module!");
+
+  // Before executing passes, print the final values of the LLVM options.
+  cl::PrintOptionValues();
+
+  if (MPM) {
+    assert(MAM && "expect a ModuleAnalysisManager!");
+    MPM->run(*M, *MAM);
+  }
+
+  ExitOnErr(MFPM.run(*M, MFAM));
+
+  if (Context.getDiagHandlerPtr()->HasErrors)
+    exit(1);
+
+  if (BOS)
+    Out->os() << Buffer;
+}
+
+int llvm::compileModuleWithNewPM(
+    StringRef Arg0, std::unique_ptr<Module> M, std::unique_ptr<MIRParser> MIR,
+    std::unique_ptr<TargetMachine> Target, std::unique_ptr<ToolOutputFile> Out,
+    std::unique_ptr<ToolOutputFile> DwoOut, LLVMContext &Context,
+    const TargetLibraryInfoImpl &TLII, bool NoVerify,
+    const std::vector<std::string> &RunPassNames, CodeGenFileType FileType) {
+
+  if (!RunPassNames.empty() && TargetPassConfig::hasLimitedCodeGenPipeline()) {
+    WithColor::warning(errs(), Arg0)
+        << "run-pass cannot be used with "
+        << TargetPassConfig::getLimitedCodeGenPipelineReason(" and ") << ".\n";
+    return 1;
+  }
+
+  LLVMTargetMachine &LLVMTM = static_cast<LLVMTargetMachine &>(*Target);
+
+  {
+    raw_pwrite_stream *OS = &Out->os();
+
+    // Manually do the buffering rather than using buffer_ostream,
+    // so we can memcmp the contents in CompileTwice mode in future.
+    SmallString<0> Buffer;
+    std::unique_ptr<raw_svector_ostream> BOS;
+    if ((codegen::getFileType() != CodeGenFileType::AssemblyFile &&
+         !Out->os().supportsSeeking())) {
+      BOS = std::make_unique<raw_svector_ostream>(Buffer);
+      OS = BOS.get();
+    }
+
+    // Fetch options from TargetPassConfig
+    CGPassBuilderOption Opt = getCGPassBuilderOption();
+    Opt.DisableVerify = NoVerify;
+    Opt.DebugPM = DebugPM;
+    Opt.RegAlloc = RegAlloc;
+
+    PassInstrumentationCallbacks PIC;
+    StandardInstrumentations SI(Context, Opt.DebugPM);
+    SI.registerCallbacks(PIC);
+    registerCodeGenCallback(PIC, LLVMTM);
+
+    LoopAnalysisManager LAM;
+    FunctionAnalysisManager FAM;
+    CGSCCAnalysisManager CGAM;
+    ModuleAnalysisManager MAM;
+    PassBuilder PB(Target.get(), PipelineTuningOptions(), std::nullopt, &PIC);
+    PB.registerModuleAnalyses(MAM);
+    PB.registerCGSCCAnalyses(CGAM);
+    PB.registerFunctionAnalyses(FAM);
+    PB.registerLoopAnalyses(LAM);
+    PB.crossRegisterProxies(LAM, FAM, CGAM, MAM);
+
+    FAM.registerPass([&] { return TargetLibraryAnalysis(TLII); });
+    MAM.registerPass([&] { return MachineModuleAnalysis(&LLVMTM); });
+
+    MachineFunctionAnalysisManager MFAM(FAM, MAM);
+
+    if (!RunPassNames.empty()) {
+      // Construct a custom pass pipeline that starts after instruction
+      // selection.
+
+      if (!MIR) {
+        WithColor::warning(errs(), Arg0) << "run-pass is for .mir file only.\n";
+        return 1;
+      }
+
+      MachineFunctionPassManager MFPM;
+      ExitOnErr(PB.parsePassPipeline(MFPM, llvm::join(RunPassNames, ",")));
----------------
paperchalice wrote:

Not sure why it reuse `--run-pass` option, but machine function passes may have options, that is why I move the machine function parsing part from `TargetMachine` to `PassBuilder`. Should we introduce a new option like `--mir-passes='pass1<param>,pass2...'`?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70922


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list