[lld] [lld][WebAssembly] Fix bitcode LTO order in archive parsing (PR #73095)

[Sam Clegg via llvm-commits]

sbc100 wrote:

> Does doing something like #67445 instead help as well? If so, maybe go with that instead.

This change seems like a clear improvement/bugfix to me.   If something like #67445 is needed then that would probably be for a separate issue, which I guess we have not yet seen?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73095