[llvm] [NewPM][CodeGen] add TargetPassConfig like API (PR #70906)

[via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -224,38 +268,55 @@ template <typename DerivedT> class CodeGenPassBuilder {
     AddMachinePass(MachineFunctionPassManager &PM) : PM(PM) {}
 
     template <typename PassT> void operator()(PassT &&Pass) {
-      static_assert(
-          is_detected<has_key_t, PassT>::value,
-          "Machine function pass must define a static member variable `Key`.");
       for (auto &C : BeforeCallbacks)
-        if (!C(&PassT::Key))
+        if (!C(PassT::ID()))
           return;
       PM.addPass(std::forward<PassT>(Pass));
       for (auto &C : AfterCallbacks)
-        C(&PassT::Key);
-    }
-
-    template <typename PassT> void insertPass(AnalysisKey *ID, PassT Pass) {
-      AfterCallbacks.emplace_back(
-          [this, ID, Pass = std::move(Pass)](AnalysisKey *PassID) {
-            if (PassID == ID)
-              this->PM.addPass(std::move(Pass));
-          });
+        C(PassT::ID(), PassT::name());
     }
 
-    void disablePass(AnalysisKey *ID) {
-      BeforeCallbacks.emplace_back(
-          [ID](AnalysisKey *PassID) { return PassID != ID; });
+    template <typename PassT> void insertPass(MachinePassKey *ID, PassT Pass) {
+      AfterCallbacks.emplace_back([this, ID, Pass = std::move(Pass)](
----------------
paperchalice wrote:

Currently not. I checked backends codes, seems only `insertPass`, `disablePass` and substitute some specific passes (in fact, 
 only `PostRAScheduler`) are needed but add some call backs are ok.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70906