[llvm] [DAGCombiner] Don't drop atomic property of original load. (PR #75626)

Craig Topper via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Dec 17 11:44:47 PST 2023

Previous message: [llvm] [DAGCombiner] Don't drop atomic property of original load. (PR #75626)
Next message: [llvm] [DAGCombiner] Don't drop atomic property of original load. (PR #75626)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

topperc wrote:

Shouldn't a seq_cst load be an ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD not an ISD::LOAD?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75626

Previous message: [llvm] [DAGCombiner] Don't drop atomic property of original load. (PR #75626)
Next message: [llvm] [DAGCombiner] Don't drop atomic property of original load. (PR #75626)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list