[llvm] [MC][x86] Fix missing check in MC binary expression (PR #75693)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Dec 16 00:42:12 PST 2023
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: Chenyang Gao (cygao90)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
This fixes #<!-- -->73109.
In instruction `addl %eax %rax`, because there is a missing comma in the middle of two registers, the asm parser will treat it as a binary expression.
```
%rax % rax --> register mod identifier
```
However, In `MCExpr::evaluateAsRelocatableImpl`, it only checks the left side of the expression. This patch ensures the right side will also be checked.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75693.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp (+11-10)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp b/llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp
index 73e6569f96e463..4bed3d2d7a1c94 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/MC/MCExpr.cpp
@@ -942,16 +942,17 @@ bool MCExpr::evaluateAsRelocatableImpl(MCValue &Res, const MCAssembler *Asm,
Addrs, InSet)) {
// Check if both are Target Expressions, see if we can compare them.
if (const MCTargetExpr *L = dyn_cast<MCTargetExpr>(ABE->getLHS())) {
- const MCTargetExpr *R = cast<MCTargetExpr>(ABE->getRHS());
- switch (ABE->getOpcode()) {
- case MCBinaryExpr::EQ:
- Res = MCValue::get(L->isEqualTo(R) ? -1 : 0);
- return true;
- case MCBinaryExpr::NE:
- Res = MCValue::get(L->isEqualTo(R) ? 0 : -1);
- return true;
- default:
- break;
+ if (const MCTargetExpr *R = dyn_cast<MCTargetExpr>(ABE->getRHS())) {
+ switch (ABE->getOpcode()) {
+ case MCBinaryExpr::EQ:
+ Res = MCValue::get(L->isEqualTo(R) ? -1 : 0);
+ return true;
+ case MCBinaryExpr::NE:
+ Res = MCValue::get(L->isEqualTo(R) ? 0 : -1);
+ return true;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
}
}
return false;
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75693
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list