[llvm] [llvm][Support] Add indirection to call correct validate(...) function (PR #71966)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 14 01:30:45 PST 2023


arrv-sc wrote:

> Is this a similar problem to what `detail::doMapping` is solving for the mapping function? Perhaps we could structure this the same way for consistency?

I actually agree with you. Updated.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71966


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list