[llvm] [RISCV] Support load clustering in the MachineScheduler (off by default) (PR #73754)

[Zi Xuan Wu via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -2231,6 +2232,60 @@ bool RISCVInstrInfo::getMemOperandsWithOffsetWidth(
   return true;
 }
 
+// TODO: This was copied from SIInstrInfo. Could it be lifted to a common
+// helper?
+static bool memOpsHaveSameBasePtr(const MachineInstr &MI1,
+                                  ArrayRef<const MachineOperand *> BaseOps1,
+                                  const MachineInstr &MI2,
+                                  ArrayRef<const MachineOperand *> BaseOps2) {
+  // Only examine the first "base" operand of each instruction, on the
+  // assumption that it represents the real base address of the memory access.
+  // Other operands are typically offsets or indices from this base address.
+  if (BaseOps1.front()->isIdenticalTo(*BaseOps2.front()))
+    return true;
+
+  if (!MI1.hasOneMemOperand() || !MI2.hasOneMemOperand())
+    return false;
+
+  auto MO1 = *MI1.memoperands_begin();
+  auto MO2 = *MI2.memoperands_begin();
+  if (MO1->getAddrSpace() != MO2->getAddrSpace())
+    return false;
+
+  auto Base1 = MO1->getValue();
+  auto Base2 = MO2->getValue();
+  if (!Base1 || !Base2)
+    return false;
+  Base1 = getUnderlyingObject(Base1);
+  Base2 = getUnderlyingObject(Base2);
+
+  if (isa<UndefValue>(Base1) || isa<UndefValue>(Base2))
+    return false;
+
+  return Base1 == Base2;
+}
+
+bool RISCVInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps(
+    ArrayRef<const MachineOperand *> BaseOps1,
+    ArrayRef<const MachineOperand *> BaseOps2, unsigned ClusterSize,
+    unsigned NumBytes) const {
+  // If the mem ops (to be clustered) do not have the same base ptr, then they
+  // should not be clustered
+  if (!BaseOps1.empty() && !BaseOps2.empty()) {
+    const MachineInstr &FirstLdSt = *BaseOps1.front()->getParent();
+    const MachineInstr &SecondLdSt = *BaseOps2.front()->getParent();
+    if (!memOpsHaveSameBasePtr(FirstLdSt, BaseOps1, SecondLdSt, BaseOps2))
+      return false;
+  } else if (!BaseOps1.empty() || !BaseOps2.empty()) {
+    // If only one base op is empty, they do not have the same base ptr
+    return false;
+  }
+
----------------
zixuan-wu wrote:

Ooops. I see the follow-up PR https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73778, that what I want.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73754