[lld] [LLD][RISCV] Fix incorrect call relaxation when mixing +c and -c objects (PR #73977)

[Philip Reames via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# REQUIRES: riscv
+# RUN: rm -rf %t && split-file %s %t && cd %t
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+c,+relax a.s -o a.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 -mattr=-c,+relax b.s -o b.o
+
+# RUN: ld.lld a.o b.o --shared -o a
+# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn -M no-aliases a | FileCheck %s
+
+## This needs to be a *uncompressed* jal instruction since it came from the
+## source file which does not enable C
+# CHECK-LABEL: <foo>:
+# CHECK-NEXT:    1260: jal zero, 0x1260 <foo>
+# CHECK-NEXT:    1264: addi zero, zero, 0
+
+# w/C
+#--- a.s
+	.text
+	.attribute	4, 16
+	.attribute	5, "rv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_f2p2_d2p2_c2p0_zicsr2p0_zifencei2p0"
+
+# w/o C
+#--- b.s
+	.text
+	.attribute	4, 16
+	.attribute	5, "rv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_f2p2_d2p2_zicsr2p0_zifencei2p0"
+	.p2align	5
+	.type	foo, at function
+foo:
+    tail    foo
+    nop
----------------
preames wrote:

Do you have a specific suggestion?  I don't really see why I care that a nop could be produced by relaxation since I'm testing one particular case here, but I'm happy to adjust to your preference.  

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73977