[PATCH] D99750: [LV, VP]VP intrinsics support for the Loop Vectorizer
Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 17 12:53:18 PST 2023
fhahn added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanRecipes.cpp:1743
+ PHINode *EntryPart =
+ State.Builder.CreatePHI(Start->getType(), 2, "evl.based.iv");
+ EntryPart->addIncoming(Start, VectorPH);
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > shiva0217 wrote:
> > > > There is a case that the PHI didnt' been inserted at top of basic block.
> > > >
> > > > int foo (int value, int *buf, int *end) {
> > > > int *tmp;
> > > > for (tmp = buf; tmp < end; tmp++)
> > > > value -= *tmp;
> > > > return value;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Should we specify insertion point?
> > > > Something like:
> > > >
> > > > PHINode *EntryPart = PHINode::Create(
> > > > Start->getType(), 2, "evl.based.iv", &*State.CFG.PrevBB->getFirstInsertionPt());
> > > Fixed in VPlanTransforms.cpp by inserting the recipe immediately after CanonicalIVPHI.
> > I think `VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe` should be turned into a subclass of VPHeaderPHIRecipe, this will also ensure that the VPlan verifier checks it is in the header section
> You mean it should be dervied from VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe? Already done.
Great!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99750/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99750
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list