[llvm] Introduce DIExpression::foldConstantMath() (PR #71718)

[Adrian Prantl via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1998,6 +1997,286 @@ DIExpression::constantFold(const ConstantInt *CI) {
           ConstantInt::get(getContext(), NewInt)};
 }
 
+static bool isConstOperation(uint64_t Op) {
+  return Op == dwarf::DW_OP_constu || Op == dwarf::DW_OP_consts;
+}
+
+static bool operationIsNoOp(uint64_t Op, uint64_t Val) {
+  switch (Op) {
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_plus:
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_minus:
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_shl:
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_shr:
+    return Val == 0;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_mul:
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_div:
+    return Val == 1;
+  default:
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+static std::optional<uint64_t>
+foldOperationIfPossible(uint64_t Op, uint64_t Operand1, uint64_t Operand2) {
+  switch (Op) {
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_plus:
+    return Operand1 + Operand2;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_minus:
+    return Operand1 - Operand2;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_shl:
+    return Operand1 << Operand2;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_shr:
+    return Operand1 >> Operand2;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_mul:
+    return Operand1 * Operand2;
+  case dwarf::DW_OP_div:
+    return Operand1 / Operand2;
+  default:
+    return std::nullopt;
+  }
+}
+
+static bool operationsAreFoldableAndCommutative(uint64_t Op1, uint64_t Op2) {
----------------
adrian-prantl wrote:

These function signatures are confusing because they just take uint64 parameters and there's no commend explaining what the expected input is...
It might be better to separate out isCommutative and isFoldable, and just have more generic rules that apply to all commutative operators?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71718